🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.